Software Outsourcing Company in Romania | Infobest

## Infobest: Romanian Software Outsourcing Company

Infobest is a software outsourcing company based in Romania, specializing in custom software development, dedicated development teams, QA and testing, IT consulting, and a range of adjacent technical services. Their client base appears weighted toward European mid-market and enterprise buyers, with named references from Bosch Sicherheitssysteme and Rewe Touristik, which signals experience working with structured, process-heavy organizations where deadlines and budget adherence matter.

The company frames its positioning around what it calls "Rightshore" delivery, meaning they tailor the sourcing model (onshore, nearshore, or offshore) to the specific project rather than defaulting to one model. For European buyers, Romania sits in an attractive position: same or near-same timezone as Germany, France, Benelux, and the Nordics, strong technical university output, and lower cost than Western European development shops. That combination is the practical reason most European companies come to Romanian IT vendors in the first place.

### What They Actually Do

Infobest's service lines span several areas worth separating out.

**Custom Software Development** is the core offering. Their technology stack includes .Net, Java, PHP, PL/I, and COBOL. The inclusion of PL/I and COBOL is notable, because those are legacy mainframe languages not commonly advertised by newer software shops. If you're running a financial institution or a manufacturing company with legacy systems that need maintenance or migration, that specific capability is worth verifying in your discovery call.

**Dedicated Development Teams** function as an extended workbench model, where Infobest provides a team that integrates into your existing development process. This suits companies that want to scale headcount without the cost and time drag of local hiring, and want clear accountability rather than a project-by-project engagement.

**QA and Testing** is positioned as a standalone practice, covering full-scale testing across platforms and devices. They describe this as expert-level, with a dedicated QA team managing vulnerability testing and release cycles within budget. For buyers who run separate QA from development, this can be contracted independently.

**E-Commerce Development** is called out as a named vertical service line. Given the industry focus also lists ecommerce as a named sector, buyers in retail and digital commerce looking for development support have a clear starting point.

**Web and Graphic Design** is listed but not described in depth. Treat this as a supporting capability rather than a primary one unless you verify scope on a call.

**IT Consulting and Support** round out the offering. These are positioned as ongoing managed service capabilities, covering infrastructure topics alongside development. The Bosch reference specifically mentions both infrastructural topics and development support from experienced consultants, which suggests this is a real operating capability rather than a marketing add-on.

**AI and Cloud Solutions** are listed, including AI software development, machine learning, deep learning, cloud migration, and cloud identity management. Also listed are Big Data development and IoT development. These are growth-area services that many mid-size Romanian IT firms have added in recent years. I would probe these areas more carefully in a vendor conversation, specifically asking for completed project references, team composition, and the methodologies used. Listing these capabilities is easier than delivering them at the same maturity as core services.

### Industry Focus

Infobest lists named vertical software practices for ecommerce, manufacturing, media and communications, telecom, automotive, and finance. That breadth is notable for a company of this profile. The Rewe Touristik reference (travel and retail) and Bosch reference (industrial/security systems) suggest the manufacturing and industrial sector experience is real. Finance is listed but not evidenced by a named reference in the available information, so treat it as a claimed vertical rather than a confirmed specialty.

### Delivery Model and Engagement Structure

They describe two core delivery models: managed projects (where Infobest owns delivery end to end) and extended workbench (where they provide dedicated capacity within the client's process). This is a meaningful distinction. If you have a well-documented process and want team augmentation, the extended workbench model keeps operational control on your side. If you're handing over a defined scope and want a single point of accountability, the managed project route suits better. The right choice depends on how much project management bandwidth you have internally and how mature your documentation is.

The company has operated for over 20 years, citing standardized processes and methodologies applied across that period. That tenure matters because it implies they've seen project failures, process breakdowns, and client transitions, and have presumably built some institutional response to them. It does not guarantee process quality, but 20 years of European enterprise references is a more meaningful signal than a vendor citing a generic process framework on their homepage.

### Editor's Take

Infobest fits a specific buyer profile reasonably well: an European company, most likely German-speaking or Western European, that needs .Net, Java, or PHP development capacity (or legacy COBOL or PL/I support), values timezone proximity, and wants a vendor with structured project management discipline rather than a pure cost play. The Bosch and Rewe references suggest they can hold their own in regulated, deadline-sensitive environments.

The things I would verify before shortlisting them seriously: first, confirm what the actual team size is, because the available information does not give a headcount, and team size affects how they handle scope growth or parallel workstreams. Second, if you're buying AI or cloud services specifically, ask for completed-project references in those areas, not capability statements. Third, ask how QA is structured relative to development, specifically whether the QA team is independent of the delivery team or embedded, because that independence question has real implications for defect catch rates. Fourth, confirm pricing model and whether rates are fixed for the engagement term or subject to adjustment, especially relevant given that Romanian tech labor costs have moved meaningfully in the past several years.

If your requirement is legacy system support combined with modern stack development from a nearshore European vendor, this is a reasonable vendor to evaluate seriously.