Trial Graphics & Trial Animation

About Trial Graphics & Trial Animation

Trial Graphics & Trial Animation (courtroomanimation.com) is a US-based legal visualization firm specializing in forensic animation, courtroom graphics, and demonstrative evidence for attorneys on both the plaintiff and defense sides. With offices in Los Angeles, Denver, Tennessee, and Atlanta, the firm has worked on over 2,000 cases and claims more than $1 billion in combined client results, a figure worth verifying directly, but the case portfolio across their results page does include named law firms and specific settlement amounts. The core work falls into three areas: 3D animation (accident reconstruction, medical malpractice, product liability, birth injury, and more), illustration (surgical steps, machine internals, expert witness data visualization), and forensic analysis (camera recreation, vehicle speed analysis, pedestrian motion, line-of-sight reconstruction). Practice areas covered include aviation accidents, construction and industrial incidents, environmental law, traumatic brain injury, and personal injury, essentially the full range of civil litigation where visual evidence is contested. The firm explicitly tracks admissibility, claiming a 99% admissibility rate for its demonstrative evidence. That is a marketing claim, but the emphasis on scientific accuracy and the depth of the practice-area coverage suggests this is not a generalist graphics shop, they have built their positioning around courtroom-specific standards. From a buyer's perspective, which here means the attorney or law firm evaluating visual litigation support, I would ask three things before engaging: first, whether they have handled the specific injury or accident type before (a birth injury animation requires very different anatomy knowledge than a vehicle collision reconstruction); second, what their revision and deadline process looks like during trial prep, when timelines compress fast; and third, whether the quoted price covers expert review cycles, because admissibility often depends on the underlying expert's sign-off, not just the visual quality. The testimonials on site mention deadline reliability positively, which is worth confirming with a reference call. This vendor appears best suited to plaintiff and defense litigation firms handling complex personal injury, medical malpractice, or criminal defense matters where a strong visual can shift jury comprehension.